April 2015 - Boost-users - lists.stage.boost.cppalliance.org

[interprocess] Determine size of managed_shared_memory
by Kai Benndorf 12 Oct '19

12 Oct '19

Hi all, I want to create a managed_shared_memory in exactly the size I needed. Therefore I do something like this: size = sizeof( common_managed_shared_memory ); size += sizeof( MyClassInSharedMem ); managed_shared_memory segment(create_only, "name", size ); MyClassInSharedMem allocates itself some memory by segment->allocate(). I added this also to the size, but get a boost::interprocess::bad_alloc exception on allocating this additional memory. Are there some magic bytes I forgot to add? Many thanks in advance Kai

3 3

[Range, Phoenix] What am I missing...
by Robert Jones 25 Apr '17

25 Apr '17

Hi Folks Can anyone explain the output of this program... #include <iostream> #include <boost/range/algorithm/copy.hpp> #include <boost/range/counting_range.hpp> #include <boost/range/adaptor/reversed.hpp> #include <boost/range/adaptor/transformed.hpp> #include <boost/phoenix/bind/bind_function.hpp> #include <boost/phoenix/core/argument.hpp> int f( int i ) { return i * 2; } int main( ) { using boost::adaptors::reversed; using boost::adaptors::transformed; using boost::counting_range; using boost::copy; using boost::phoenix::arg_names::_1; copy( counting_range( 1, 5 ) | reversed | transformed( f ), std::ostream_iterator<int>( std::cout, " " ) ); std::cout << std::endl; copy( counting_range( 1, 5 ) | reversed | transformed( bind( f, _1 ) ), std::ostream_iterator<int>( std::cout, " " ) ); std::cout << std::endl; } Which is... 8 6 4 2 1768406272 1768406272 1768406272 1768406272 I'm using Gcc 4.6.2 & Boost 1.53 Thx All.

3 2

[statechart] Passing parameters from event to State Local Storage
by Christophe Bourez 16 Nov '16

16 Nov '16

I need to maintain a parameter into the state local storage. This parameter is initially contained in the event that causes the transition to the target state. I give hereafter a small illustrative example. typename sc = boost::statechart; class EvTest : public sc::event<EvTest> { public: EvTest(std::size_t val) : value(val) {} std::size_t getValue() const { return this->value; } private: std::size_t value; }; class MyStateMachine; class StSource; class StTarget; class StSource : public sc::simple_state<StSource, MyStateMachine> { public: typedef sc::custom_reaction<EvTest> reactions; sc::result react(const EvTest &event) { // How to pass event.getValue() to the target state ? transit<StTarget>(); } }; class StTarget : public sc::simple_state<StTarget, MyStateMachine> { public: StTarget(std::size_t val) : val(value) {} private: std::size_t value; }; Thanks, Christophe

3 3

Re: [Boost-users] Crashing Issue
by swati upadhyaya 04 Nov '15

04 Nov '15

hi I am using like this where RunningThreads_ is vector containing boost thread object pointer(handler).I am using interrupt() for the interruption of thread interruption_point() catching that interruption then joining.everytime its crashing in join() for me but for others who have the same configuration its working fine all of us has windos 8. For me also it was working last week but this week the same piece of code is crashing. :( RunningThreads_[i].handle->interrupt(); RunningThreads_[i].handle->join(); delete RunningThreads_[i].handle; On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:31 AM, swati upadhyaya <swatiupadhyaya(a)gmail.com> wrote: > RunningThreads_[i].handle->interrupt(); > LOG4CPLUS_INFO(root, "Thread Interrupted for " << > RunningThreads_[i].app_name << " successful"); > RunningThreads_[i].handle->join(); > LOG4CPLUS_INFO(root, "Waiting for thread to exit " << > RunningThreads_[i].app_name << " successful"); > delete RunningThreads_[i].handle; > LOG4CPLUS_INFO(root, "Thread handle for " << > RunningThreads_[i].app_name << " successfully deleted"); > //RunningThreads_.erase(i); > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba < > vicente.botet(a)wanadoo.fr> wrote: > >> Le 03/02/15 09:10, swati upadhyaya a écrit : >> >> In my code join() timed_joined() is crashing, I am using these API >> after interrupt(),Same piece of code is working for others but in my system >> its crashing, >> Is there some dependency problem I am using >> Boost version: 1.55.0 >> OS: Windows 8 >> IDE: Visual Studio 2010 >> >> Hi, >> >> it could help if you post the example and the backtrace. >> >> Which version/OS/compiler use others for which this works? >> >> Vicente >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Boost-users mailing list >> Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org >> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users >> > >

7 10

the stability of breadth_first_visit in BGL
by breadbread1984 14 Jul '15

14 Jul '15

I am wondering if breadth_first_visit can always get the same sequence of vertex no matter whether the graph is serialized and deserialized again. Thx

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [IPC Named Mutex]
by Lorenzo Trivelli 19 Jun '15

19 Jun '15

> >One thing you could try...in interprocess's win32_api.hpp, there is another implementation of get_last_bootup_time() which uses WMI instead of the event log (there were warnings in the source about WMI not supporting hibernation/clock changes correctly, so beware). If you define >BOOST_INTERPROCESS_BOOTSTAMP_IS_LASTBOOTUPTIME >it should use that other version...give that a try. (in visual studio Project Properties -> C/C++ -> Preprocessor -> Preprocessor Definitions: add a semi colon ';' then t Thanks Tom, I'll try to fallback to the "old" WMI version (which BTW worked in the 1.44 version I we used before) I'd also be glad to fix it by myself and so help boost developement, , but I do not completely understand the usage of the system boot time... If boost needs in some way a tmestamp to differentiate things, in my opinion there are plenty of them to use instead of the last boot time. Obviously it has been done for a reason, but I cannot understand why :-D Best regards Lorenzo

2 2

Some strange boost headers errors
by alfonso santimone 15 May '15

15 May '15

Hi guys, i'm a boost newbie. I've got to include boost libraries in the include path of a VisualStudio 2012 project. When i try to compile i have all these errors. Every errors is related to missing headers ( boost ones and even standard Win ones ) and to synthax errors depending on missing headers i guess. Do someone have any idea on what's wrong here? I just post here a few lines of errors, but the other ones are all of the same kind Error 1 error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'boost' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\core\ checked_delete.hpp 24 1 csound~ Error 2 error C2059: syntax error : ';' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\core\checked_delete.hpp 24 1 csound~ Error 3 error C2449: found '{' at file scope (missing function header?) C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\core\checked_delete.hpp 25 1 csound~ Error 4 error C2059: syntax error : '}' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\core\checked_delete.hpp 67 1 csound~ Error 5 error C2054: expected '(' to follow 'using' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\include\cstddef 19 1 csound~ Error 6 error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'using' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\include\cstddef 19 1 csound~ Error 7 error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'boost' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\smart_ptr\detail\sp_nullptr_t.hpp 23 1 csound~ Error 8 error C2059: syntax error : ';' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\smart_ptr\detail\sp_nullptr_t.hpp 23 1 csound~ Error 9 error C2449: found '{' at file scope (missing function header?) C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\smart_ptr\detail\sp_nullptr_t.hpp 24 1 csound~ Error 10 error C2059: syntax error : '}' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\smart_ptr\detail\sp_nullptr_t.hpp 41 1 csound~ Error 11 error C2054: expected '(' to follow 'using' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\include\cstdlib 19 1 csound~ Error 12 error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'using' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\include\cstdlib 19 1 csound~ Error 13 error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'abort' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio many thanks in advance bests alfonso www.elgallorojorecords.com soundcloud.com/alfonsosantimone www.facebook.com/alfonsosantimone

2 3

Re: [Boost-users] lexical_cast between double and string slow in Visual Studio 2013
by David Roberts 07 May '15

07 May '15

> That issue is unknown. I'd really appreciate the investigation. I have done some more investigation, and there are two factors that only cause the slowness when they both occur together. > Try excluding the lexical_cast from test, I have a feeling that this is only MSVC related issue: > > #include <sstream> > #include <string> > > int main (int, char **) > { > for (double count = 0.0; count < 1000000.0; count += 1.41) > { > std::stringstream ss; > ss << count; > std::string result = std::move(ss.str()); > ss.str(std::string()); > > ss << result; > ss >> count; > } > > return 0; > } > Running your test program does not exhibit the problem. It runs in around 3 seconds on my machine when built with either Visual Studio 2010 or Visual Studio 2013. However, changing it very slightly to match more closely what lexical_cast does internally does recreate the problem: #include <sstream> #include <string> int main (int, char **) { for (double count = 0.0; count < 1000000.0; count += 1.41) { std::stringstream ss; ss.unsetf(std::ios::skipws); ss.precision(17); ss << count; std::string result = std::move(ss.str()); ss.str(std::string()); ss << result; ss >> count; } return 0; } The effect of setting the precision to 17 is that lots of 9s appear in the string representations. (The number 17 is what boost::detail::lcast_get_precision(double*) chooses.) Without the precision call the contents of the string called result start off like this: 0 1.41 2.82 4.23 5.64 7.05 8.46 9.87 11.28 12.69 With precision set to 17 they start off like this: 0 1.4099999999999999 2.8199999999999998 4.2299999999999995 5.6399999999999997 7.0499999999999998 8.4599999999999991 9.8699999999999992 11.279999999999999 12.69 This happens for both Visual Studio 2010 and Visual Studio 2013. Then the next difference is that Visual Studio 2013 spends a lot longer handling all the extra 9s. Changing the program so that the double is converted to a string using std::stringstream without a precision call and then back to double using lexical_cast takes about 3 seconds for both Visual Studio 2010 and Visual Studio 2013. It is the combination of having all the extra 9s to parse and using Visual Studio 2013 that makes the test using lexical_cast to go both ways slow. Both Visual Studio 2010 and Visual Studio 2013 do the conversion by calling std::num_get<char,std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> > >::do_get() which then calls a function called _Stodx() which is implemented in xstod.c. This function is very different for the two versions. In Visual Studio 2010 it's a relatively thin wrapper around the C function strtod(). In Visual Studio 2013 _Stodx() has got a completely new implementation that's generated by #including xxstod.h with some macros defined. The original C function strtod() is much faster than the new _Stodx() when there are lots of 9s at the end of the strings being parsed. This modification to the program: #include <sstream> #include <string> #include <stdlib.h> int main (int, char **) { for (double count = 0.0; count < 1000000.0; count += 1.41) { std::stringstream ss; ss.unsetf(std::ios::skipws); ss.precision(17); ss << count; std::string result = std::move(ss.str()); ss.str(std::string()); ss << result; char *endptr; count = strtod(ss.str().c_str(), &endptr); } return 0; } has a runtime of about 3 seconds even though it's got to cope with all the 9s. I guess only someone from Microsoft or Dinkumware could comment on why _Stodx() was reimplemented. But the other thing is that by setting precision to 17 lexical_cast is bloating the string representations of the doubles with lots of 9s in both Visual Studio 2010 and Visual Studio 2013. Setting precision to 15 instead prevents this, and makes the original test run faster even with Visual Studio 2013 (about 4 seconds rather than 10). Regards, David

2 1

[serialization] std::shared_ptr with Boost >= 1.53
by Rüdiger Berlich 04 May '15

04 May '15

Hi there, I need to support various versions of Boost, but am in the process of porting our entire code base to C++11. This involves replacing those constructs of Boost that are now in the standard with their C++11-counterparts. A prime example is std::shared_ptr. However, most of our code needs to be serializable. I know that serialization of std::shared_ptr is possible with Boost 1.58. But 1.53 (the oldest version I need to support) cannot serialize std::shared_ptr . Is there any reason not to include the 1.58-Version of #include <boost/serialization/shared_ptr.hpp> instead of the older version, if I detect a Boost-version < 1.58 ? Thanks and Best Regards, Beet

1 1

Boost.Cgi Status
by Michael Ainsworth 01 May '15

01 May '15

What is the status of Boost.Cgi by Darren Garvey? It seems that the library hasn't been accepted and it's now 2015 - at least 7 years after last Boost Users mailing list post regarding its status. Michael

4 3