Hi Jeff ----- Mensaje original ----- De: Jeff Garland <jeff@crystalclearsoftware.com> Fecha: Domingo, Marzo 28, 2004 9:25 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Indexed Set

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:09:24 +0200, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote

...

...

...

...

2) bidirectional_map

I have no problem with waiting. There's no question that on my current project there are 5 or 6 places I could have used bi-map. So at the moment it is the one I'd like to see.

Thanx for your patience. I hope in the meantime (some months) you can get by with the bimap from the example.

...

...

...

...

5) Naming

[about boost::container::multi_index namespace]

...

Seems to me the general perception is that sooner or later libs will be have to be migrate to the appropriate umbrella namespace; newcomers should do it right away.

Well, I'm actually not very concerned about the namespace -- it's the directory structure that is a major hassle to fix: CVS, doc pointers, etc. Its possible the other authors of containers won't want to refactor the directory structure. So I think we want to make sure they are willing to do this at some point before we send you down this path.

At this point, whatever decision involves a manageable amount of work. So I'll stick with what people like most. Further changes would be much more painful. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo