Re: CW 9.3 results (or lack thereof) - current state
Stefan,
After one day and one night of investigation, I think (!) I've finally managed to make bjam report correct results for my regressions. Your perseverance is much appreciated.
The results for CW-9.3 seem to be correct now and thus there should be some more failing test cases for this toolset now.
I have fixed the compilation problem with uBLAS you reported. So I was looking forward to seeing the results. Now I see the runtime errors so there is still work to be done! Thanks, Michael
Michael Stevens wrote:
I have fixed the compilation problem with uBLAS you reported. So I was looking forward to seeing the results. Now I see the runtime errors so there is still work to be done!
I've noticed that once again all ublas test cases threw a gpf in the last run or CW 9.3. I think I used the latest sources, but at the moment I've switched back to non-incremental builds and thus we can be sure tomorrow. Stefan
participants (10)
-
Michael Stevens -
Stefan Slapeta