Re: [boost] FORMAL Review of "Output Formatter" library - 7 days left
John Torjo wrote:
Hi Reece,
Maybe you can show more about this after the review is over. It's good that boosters now know you've already started to improve the lib based on feedback, but for now, I think it's better for them to focus feedback on the existing lib: http://www.torjo.com/code/outfmt.zip
Or maybe I'm just plain wrong ;)
Sure. There has been some great feedback thus far. I just wanted to let boosters know the direction I am taking, WRT naming and other areas (like adding support for setting decorators on the stream like Dave suggested). Regards, Reece _________________________________________________________________ Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
Reece Dunn wrote:
John Torjo wrote:
Hi Reece,
Maybe you can show more about this after the review is over. It's good that boosters now know you've already started to improve the lib based on feedback, but for now, I think it's better for them to focus feedback on the existing lib: http://www.torjo.com/code/outfmt.zip
Or maybe I'm just plain wrong ;)
Sure. There has been some great feedback thus far. I just wanted to let boosters know the direction I am taking, WRT naming and other areas (like adding support for setting decorators on the stream like Dave suggested).
Totally ok then. Best, John -- John Torjo -- john@torjo.com Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal -- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all -- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/ -- v1.4.0 - save_dlg - true binding of your data to UI controls! + easily add validation rules (win32gui/examples/smart_dlg)
participants (3)
-
John Torjo -
Reece Dunn