[date_time] USE_DATE_TIME_PRE_1_33_FACET_IO
While comparing regression tests results for Boost.Build V1 and V2, I noted that some date_time tests fail, and traced this to the fact that V2 does not define USE_DATA_TIME_PRE_1_33_FACET_IO while compiling the tests. So, I have a couple of questions: 1. What does the macro do? I could not find anything in the docs. 2. For V2, I have as much as three choices: - Add this define to the same sets of tests and in V1 Jamfile - Add this define to "project requirements" for the date_time/test Jamfile.v2, so it will be applied to all targets - Add this define to "usage requirements" for the date_time library, so that any executable files linking to date_time will get this define set. Which option is the best? Thanks, Volodya
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:35:19 +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote
While comparing regression tests results for Boost.Build V1 and V2, I noted that some date_time tests fail, and traced this to the fact that V2 does not define USE_DATA_TIME_PRE_1_33_FACET_IO while compiling the tests.
So, I have a couple of questions:
1. What does the macro do? I could not find anything in the docs.
Sorry, the docs aren't complete yet. It turns off the new I/O code which allows for 'format-based' input/output (eg: date_facet->format("%Y/%M/%d") ). Just in case people are dependent on the old I/O facets they can use the macro to switch back. As a result we are still testing both I/O configurations...
2. For V2, I have as much as three choices:
- Add this define to the same sets of tests and in V1 Jamfile
Yes -- this is the one....for now at least.
- Add this define to "project requirements" for the date_time/test Jamfile.v2, so it will be applied to all targets - Add this define to "usage requirements" for the date_time library, so that any executable files linking to date_time will get this define set.
Which option is the best?
Jeff
participants (7)
-
Jeff Garland -
Vladimir Prus