uBLAS "test2" currently fails with most of Linux toolsets, and it used to pass in the previous release -- http://tinyurl.com/3vmlv. Does anybody has any idea what's up here? -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
uBLAS "test2" currently fails with most of Linux toolsets, and it used to pass in the previous release -- http://tinyurl.com/3vmlv. Does anybody has any idea what's up here?
Possibly stale results. I'll remove all ublas results before the next run. Regards, m
Martin Wille writes:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
uBLAS "test2" currently fails with most of Linux toolsets, and it used to pass in the previous release -- http://tinyurl.com/3vmlv. Does anybody has any idea what's up here?
Possibly stale results. I'll remove all ublas results before the next run.
Looks better now, although "test1" still fails at run-time with GCC > 2.95 and <= 3.3.3. Any uBLAS developers would like to comment on this? Also, it looks like we have the missing cells problem with "test2" and gcc-2.95.3-linux/intel-7.1-linux. Martin, if you could once again upload the bjam log to us, we'd appreciate it. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
participants (5)
-
Aleksey Gurtovoy -
Martin Wille