Re: [Boost-users] Re: How to compile minimal_test.cpp with gcc?
On Friday 14 May 2004 09:28 am, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
libs/test/src/execution_monitor.cpp: No such file or directory
There should be ..boost/libs directories installed with all source (cpp) and docs files files. I remember it was reported already that some procedure does not install it.
I strongly disagree. The headers in $BOOST_ROOT/boost should be self-contained, and their use should require only prebuild libraries (.a, .so, .dll, .lib, etc). If as a developer you need to access ../boost/libs, then I suggest those files be moved into $BOOST_ROOT/boost. Doug
"Douglas Gregor" <gregod@cs.rpi.edu> wrote in message news:200405140937.21711.gregod@cs.rpi.edu...
On Friday 14 May 2004 09:28 am, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
libs/test/src/execution_monitor.cpp: No such file or directory
There should be ..boost/libs directories installed with all source (cpp) and docs files files. I remember it was reported already that some procedure does not install it.
I strongly disagree. The headers in $BOOST_ROOT/boost should be self-contained, and their use should require only prebuild libraries (.a, .so, .dll, .lib, etc).
If as a developer you need to access ../boost/libs, then I suggest those files be moved into $BOOST_ROOT/boost.
Doug
I don't really mind. There are 2 cases when you need to include files from libs/src. Minimal testing component is using src/execution_monitor.cpp and included versions of Boost.Test offline component in boost/test/included also require all other files. Both where requested by 'no library users'. But at the time nobody requested to move sources into headers directory. Gennadiy.
participants (2)
-
Douglas Gregor -
Gennadiy Rozental