First of all thank you Gennadiy! I appreciate the speedy response and help.

...

1. I need to have the test log and report written to two separate files in xml format. (It would be nice to have a DTD of both xml formats)

Ok. Will do. Will the schema work?

Yes it would. You write 'the' schema does it exist? If so where? I am concerned with this because I am trying to provide a well formed set of html reports based upon our regression tests. To do this I need the complete specification of the available tags and their respective attributes.

...

I did this by instructing the framework with the command line argument: --output_format=XML. Now that I had both the log and result report in XML format I needed to create two file streams to redirect the output of them to each their own file. This was easy to achieve with the log using the set_log_stream method, but not so trivial with the result report. Calling the singleton of the result report before the test framework has initialized my code first calls a null pointer crashing the test. How should this be done? The documentation states that the interface of the unit_test_result does not need to be used directly, but in my case where I want a file stream instead of the std::err I need to have access to the singleton and preferable in the same place I set up the rest of my test suites.

First of all why would you need to do anything? By default log goes to std::out and report goes to std::err. Also as you mentioned log output stream could be reset using set_log_stream method.

Very true, I was so busy trying to redirect the output that I didn't even notice this fact (Is this stated in the documentation?)

This should be enough for your purposes As for report output stream it's actually unit_test_main who is responsible for setting specific stream and it not configurable at the moment.

...

2. To achieve pt 1 I needed to edit unit_test_framework.hpp (I think). I wanted to add support for my own command line argument which would instruct the framework of the two files I would like to create. So I thought it would be convenient to use the reteive_framework_parameter method to retrieve my custom command argument. Sadly enough I noticed that the method doesn't return the value assigned to my argument unless it is recognized. Is this fair?

Yes. This is true. reteive_framework_parameter only strips parameters from > command line that it knows about. The rest you are getting in init function. You could use any method to retrieve the value needed for you.

I will have to, but I it would be convenient to have this as an available service. If it is ever meant that the framework could be customized I would expect support methods of this sort.

Actually CLA support will be the first thing I am going to rework completely for next release. I think it should address your concern either. See mailing list for updates.

Nice to hear. :)

...

Daniel R. Kåsa

Gennadiy.