Threads Documentation degradation v1.32 -> v1.33
There appear to be a lot of missing words in the 1.33 version of the Boost.Threads documentation. Most notably, all "Boost.Threads" terms seem to have been removed from all the pages. This makes the document somewhat hard to read... ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Job P. Mulder Software Engineer Xsens Technologies B.V. http://www.xsens.com <http://www.xsens.com/>
"Job Mulder" <Job@xsens.com> writes:
There appear to be a lot of missing words in the 1.33 version of the Boost.Threads documentation. Most notably, all "Boost.Threads" terms seem to have been removed from all the pages. This makes the document somewhat hard to read...
I knew the threads library needed more attention than it was getting, but IMO, this is unacceptable for the release. Can something be done about it? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:17 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
"Job Mulder" <Job@xsens.com> writes:
There appear to be a lot of missing words in the 1.33 version of the Boost.Threads documentation. Most notably, all "Boost.Threads" terms seem to have been removed from all the pages. This makes the document somewhat hard to read...
I knew the threads library needed more attention than it was getting, but IMO, this is unacceptable for the release. Can something be done about it?
It's not nearly as bad as it sounds :) The problem was caused by a bug in xsltproc's entity resolution. I've updated to the newest version of the xsltproc and regenerated the documentation; everything is fine now. Doug
Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com> writes:
On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:17 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
"Job Mulder" <Job@xsens.com> writes:
There appear to be a lot of missing words in the 1.33 version of the Boost.Threads documentation. Most notably, all "Boost.Threads" terms seem to have been removed from all the pages. This makes the document somewhat hard to read...
I knew the threads library needed more attention than it was getting, but IMO, this is unacceptable for the release. Can something be done about it?
It's not nearly as bad as it sounds :) The problem was caused by a bug in xsltproc's entity resolution. I've updated to the newest version of the xsltproc and regenerated the documentation; everything is fine now.
Thanks, Doug! -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
On 30/11/05, Job Mulder <Job@xsens.com> wrote:
There appear to be a lot of missing words in the 1.33 version of the Boost.Threads documentation. Most notably, all "Boost.Threads" terms seem to have been removed from all the pages. This makes the document somewhat hard to read...
I was just looking at http://boost.org/doc/html/thread_group.html the other day and noticed some problems there too: void add_thread(thread* thrd thrd); void remove_thread(thread* thrd thrd); - Scott
On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:44 PM, me22 wrote:
On 30/11/05, Job Mulder <Job@xsens.com> wrote: I was just looking at http://boost.org/doc/html/thread_group.html the other day and noticed some problems there too: void add_thread(thread* thrd thrd); void remove_thread(thread* thrd thrd);
Good catch, thanks! Fixed for 1.33.1. Doug
participants (5)
-
David Abrahams -
Douglas Gregor -
Job Mulder -
me22