Re: [boost] Re: Two alined_storage classes in the CVS
----- Mensaje original ----- De: Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> Fecha: Jueves, Febrero 3, 2005 9:51 pm Asunto: [boost] Re: Two alined_storage classes in the CVS
Since these are in different namespaces, can this not be just ignored? Is it worth spending any time on?
Hi Robert, I'm afraid both classes live directly in namespace boost. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarollo
whoops, I had assumed that TR1 implementations would be in a separate namespace than boost. I was extrapolating from std:: whereby implementations of the standard library are in namespace std. I guess, I'll have to get a little more information about this. Robert Ramey JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
----- Mensaje original ----- De: Robert Ramey <ramey@rrsd.com> Fecha: Jueves, Febrero 3, 2005 9:51 pm Asunto: [boost] Re: Two alined_storage classes in the CVS
Since these are in different namespaces, can this not be just ignored? Is it worth spending any time on?
Hi Robert,
I'm afraid both classes live directly in namespace boost.
Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarollo
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Robert Ramey wrote:
whoops, I had assumed that TR1 implementations would be in a separate namespace than boost. I was extrapolating from std:: whereby implementations of the standard library are in namespace std. I guess, I'll have to get a little more information about this.
There is a project underway to put together a Boost TR1 implementation. At the same time, however, authors of libraries which were accepted into TR1 are working to make the Boost versions conform to the specification.
Robert Ramey
Jonathan
participants (2)
-
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z -
Jonathan Turkanis -
Robert Ramey