Here are some further attempts. Be sure to look at the first two slides. http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.ppt Sorry about the file format. I have been having trouble exporting these pictures accurately from PowerPoint. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
Here are some further attempts. Be sure to look at the first two slides.
http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.ppt
Sorry about the file format. I have been having trouble exporting these pictures accurately from PowerPoint.
I added one more. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
David Abrahams wrote:
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
Here are some further attempts. Be sure to look at the first two slides.
http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.ppt
Sorry about the file format. I have been having trouble exporting these pictures accurately from PowerPoint.
I added one more.
Is the vote open? I totally love slide 6. :) -- /Brian Riis
I don't like the typography on any of these. It looks over-busy. The rocket is nice though. -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com
At 01:20 PM 11/23/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
Here are some further attempts. Be sure to look at the first two slides.
http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.ppt
Sorry about the file format. I have been having trouble exporting these pictures accurately from PowerPoint.
I added one more.
That's even better. Be sure shrink the images down to logo size for viewing. When you do that (at least on my machine), the C++ shaddowing disappears entirely. Have you tried adding the "C++" in the same font as the "Boost"? --Beman
Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> writes:
At 01:20 PM 11/23/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
Here are some further attempts. Be sure to look at the first two slides.
http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.ppt
Sorry about the file format. I have been having trouble exporting these pictures accurately from PowerPoint.
I added one more.
That's even better. Be sure shrink the images down to logo size for viewing. When you do that (at least on my machine), the C++ shaddowing disappears entirely.
Not sure what "shadowing" you mean. The letters "C++" are in gray. They don't disappear when I shrink them.
Have you tried adding the "C++" in the same font as the "Boost"?
Not sure which image you're looking at, but the "C" is always in the same font as "Boo t." The "s" and the "++" aren't part of any font: they're custom-drawn to interlock in that special way. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
At 12:05 PM 11/23/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
Here are some further attempts. Be sure to look at the first two slides.
The second one is a candidate, I'd say. --Beman
Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> writes: G> At 12:05 PM 11/23/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
Here are some further attempts. Be sure to look at the first two slides.
The second one is a candidate, I'd say.
There are more variations up there now. http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.ppt http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.pdf -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> writes:
G> At 12:05 PM 11/23/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
Here are some further attempts. Be sure to look at the first two slides.
The second one is a candidate, I'd say.
There are more variations up there now.
http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.ppt http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.pdf
I like #3, with the C++ easily readable and slanted upward. But I'm also tempted to suggest that the "C++" itself be made the rocket that is shooting skyward.
At 07:00 PM 11/23/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> writes:
G> At 12:05 PM 11/23/2004, David Abrahams wrote:
Here are some further attempts. Be sure to look at the first two slides.
The second one is a candidate, I'd say.
There are more variations up there now.
http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.ppt http://www.luannocracy.com/logo.pdf
#5, particularly if the image is shrunk down to logo size (perhaps 1 inch wide). I'd also like to compare #5 against an otherwise identical version with "C++" added above the "Boo..." Maybe we should have a vote, including candidates from other people. But they should be presented logo size and side by side, IMO, for voting. Also identified with a number so people vote for the intended candidate. No chads allowed. --Beman
I don't think a rocket would be the most suitable symbol for Boost. To me it communicates ideas like "flight" and "space", which obviously don't fit very well. IMO, a much better variant would be a thunderbolt. It is commonly associated with "power" and "energy", exactly in the spirit of the Boost name.
On Tuesday, November 23, 2004, at 06:25 PM, Peter Petrov wrote:
I don't think a rocket would be the most suitable symbol for Boost. To me it communicates ideas like "flight" and "space", which obviously don't fit very well.
IMO, a much better variant would be a thunderbolt. It is commonly associated with "power" and "energy", exactly in the spirit of the Boost name.
Yeah, but thunderbolts, tornados, meteors, tsunamis, etc. are also associated with _raw_ power and destruction. Rockets also represent 'the final frontier', high-tech engineering. Besides, designing a package solid enough to pass the boost review process _is_ rocket science :-) A construction crane might makea good metaphor--solid and work-a-day, but also staid. --rich
participants (2)
-
Beman Dawes -
Brian Riis -
Caleb Epstein -
David Abrahams -
Deane Yang -
Peter Petrov -
Rich Johnson